28 May

Love And Trust: The Seeds Of A Marriage. Editing Life.

by Jon Katz

When I left the real world to be a full-time writer, I meant to be a novelist. I had a great editor, a solid publisher, a supportive wife and a writing contract with Rolling Stone, and an arrangement with Wired Magazine.

I set up in my basement, got two Labs, and spent the next five years writing, editing, and finally getting the book published.

It got lovely reviews; I was named a young writer to watch.  The U.S. invaded Iraq the same day my book – Sign Off – was published, and it sank beneath the waves like the Titanic.

Soon after, my wonderfully patient and gifted editor, Beverly Lewis – she insisted I was a gifted novelist and wanted more books from me – dropped dead on a New York sidewalk of a brain aneurism. My fiction was over.

Beverly was the real deal. When I came in to discuss my book, she had scores of pages laid out on a conference table, marks, and comments on everyone. That was how they did it then.

It is not how they do it now.

One day, I promised myself Beverly would look at one of my chapters or rewrites and tell me they were “brilliant, just brilliant.” She never lived to do that, alas, but I always felt the next meeting would be the day.

I realized quickly that I need some fast work to stay a published writer. I wrote a book about dogs, and a publisher signed me up for more. I could write about anything I wanted as long as a dog was on the cover and dogs were in the book.

Writing about dogs suited me.

I love living and working with them, and I worked hard to learn about them. As a dyslexic and a distractable person, I’ve always needed special editing and was grateful for it. My first wife, Paula, loved editing, she was good at it, and she edited my books until we got divorced.

She edited closely and formally, as Beverly had. Pages all marked up, not much praise.

My publishing editors got laid off, disappeared, quit, or fled the industry, and publishing changed radically. I didn’t want to write books any longer; I wanted to concentrate on my blog, make it work, and support myself.

Then I married Maria. She had no interest in publishing, other than I was a book writer and had never done any editing. She also didn’t have much confidence when it came to editing a published author. And she had her art to focus on.

But she trusted me and wanted to help if she could.

I decided to be my own editor, as challenging as Dyslexia made that. Maria didn’t edit my writing, and still doesn’t, but over the first years of our marriage, she became more confident and assertive, and I started asking her to read my blog posts; I would edit them as best I could, with the help of an expensive proofreading system that makes as many mistakes as I did.

A writer works alone, and I write some complex stuff.  As Maria grew into her own life, I saw how intelligent she was, how thoughtful, curious, and well-read.

She was not afraid to criticize or challenge; in fact, she loves doing that. She doesn’t go over my writing word for word,  but she has a keen sense of whether it holds together, makes sense, needs more work.

And she appreciates being asked. I don’t think she had a clue as to how smart she is until we’d been married for a while and started making and selling her art.

I was intrigued to see the wheel turn once more. Maria is nothing like Beverly Lewis and has no interest in poring over my every word. She gets the drift and catches me when I veer offline.

I tell people I don’t have or need an editor anymore, but of course, I do. I need to show someone I trust what I have written; it makes me feel strong and safe.

I like what has become of us. We support one another without taking over each other’s lives. It just feels good and makes me feel safe.

Maria has become more than the editor of my work; she is, in a way, a co-editor of my life, a task we perform for one another as we have worked through our lives and gotten to this good place.

I have always needed an editor. I have always been fortunate enough to have one. It is all about trust.

There is nothing more important to a writer than for him or her to trust an editor. I realized last year that I have come to completely trust Maria in a way I have never trusted anyone.

I also have continued to love her in a rich, growing, and deepening way.

When I finish a complex piece (like tonight’s essay on Amish women), I asked Maria to take a look at it. As a proud and committed feminist, I needed her input.

I left her alone in the room to look at it.

She liked the piece, made a few suggestions, and went off to blog. (Sometimes, she asks me to look over complex or emotional things that she writes).

She spots errors, sloppy sentences, sloppy reasoning. She challenges me to think harder, go deeper. But she rarely says more than a few years. She doesn’t want to get too enmeshed in my work, and I keep my distance from here.

We are always happy to see one another when we emerge from our caves.

Once or twice a month, some frustrated editor e-mails me about a typo and offers to edit my writing free of charge if I send it to them and give them a couple of hours.

I happen to love my typos and am proud of them. My doctors told me I could never write a blog.

I have become a pretty good proofreader, and my software program is learning to deal with me.

The people who e-me always surprise me. Anyone who knows much about me knows I would never entrust my writing to a stranger and send them my work to edit like it was some orphan without a place to live.

My editing is my responsibility good or bad, I take full ownership of it.

Writing is such a personal thing for me, and for most writers, my ability to show it to Maria tells me how much I have come to trust and lover.

Maria eases the loneliness of writing; even though she is in her studio all day, I’m in my study. It is just reassuring to know she is there. She doesn’t edit my work in the literal, Beverly Lewis kind of way.

She doesn’t mark up my pages with dozens of notes. She just says a few words, which is curiously, all that I need.

We just help each other out when we need to. And I appreciate that I have undertaken to edit myself in recent months, it makes me proud and happy to be in control of my writing.

This is a very new thing for me, a daily miracle. I realize that our support for one another’s work is one of the seeds we planted when we got married. Another is love; another is encouragement, a third is listening.

My marriage has taught me something about all of these things, but nothing tells me about trust than when she steps out of my study, pats Fate on the head, and says, “you did a good job, Jon, the piece really makes a lot of sense.”

It’s all I need to hear, and it means as much to me as it did when Beverly Lewis would have me 200 pages of writing with 50 pages of notes and say, “you did a good job, Jon, you are really learning. to write fiction.”

I would puff up like a balloon. I don’t puff up these days overwriting, but I still love to do it. And I love finishing it, calling up Maria and asking her to read something that “could be brilliant.”

Fifty years after Beverly, I still have never heard an editor say those words. And I’m beginning to realize; It is unlikely ever to happen.

I’ll have to be awfully good.

It’s a joke between us. I always ask her if a piece I wrote was brilliant.

“Not yet,” she says. One day, I think.

 

7 Comments

  1. Jon, I have been trying to read your blog from the beginning, I believe 2007. I have searched archives and am unable to view your journal . Do you have any suggestions how I can find the beginning of your journey. I so enjoy reading about you and Maria’s adventures.

    1. That’s 34,000 posts Sigrid, I appreciate your interest, but that’s a vast undertaking. SOme people input dates into the search engine, but I really don’t know of an easy way to go all the way back..I never do it myself..I wouldn’t wish that on anyone..

  2. ” As a proud and committed feminist, I needed her input. ” Really? Or are you just dangling?

    This explains a lot. Dogs and babies pull in captive audiences. Despite the representations in your Wiki page (which you must have written), I see nothing of the caliber in the publications you assert you wrote for. Plus your command of Standard American English does not fit their standards.

    You won’t become a brilliant writer. Face it You don’t have the deep sense of truth and awe true artists do, or the flair for the vivid, which the gifted mold into words. You come from pettiness, narcissism and ancient male? entitlement which blinds you, “As Maria grew into her own life, I saw how intelligent she was, how thoughtful, curious, and well-read.” Really? Should the superior artist SERVE? You ought to be ashamed.

    Maria has an immediate sense of truth, beauty, and vivid detail, without claiming competence that isn’t hers. She’s an artist. You’re a neurotic showoff claiming + whining too much for an adult let alone a 70 year old. I never heard any “artist” blame Iraq for their failure.

    You are nevertheless sometimes funny, a Thin skinned dogmatic, winding plots, frequent internal contradictions, simplistic character views, trying too hard to impress, appealing to the uninformed and puppy lovers, the new York con.

    1. Hey Manges, a standout message. I’ve never seen the Wikipedia page, let alone written on it. I am not a brilliant writer; for sure, it’s too late for that. I don’t think you can become brilliant at 73 (not 70, a few weeks from 74, thanks).

      No one has ever called me brilliant in my long years of life. Thus I’ve never been attacked for not being brilliant, so I’m not sure how to reply. Think of it as an odd insult, “Hey, dude, you are not brilliant!” Would I get punched or kissed on the nose? I hope you are brilliant, Manges, although brilliant people don’t usually write messages like this in my experience.

      If you wonder about my listening to Maria, why don’t you ask her? I just asked her to read this; she was nearby.

      Here is her bewildered reply: “What the hell is she talking about? It’s just angry and rude; I’d say it’s mean for the sake of being mean; I don’t know what the point is.” Maria, bless her, does not do mean. It always confounds her.

      I’ll be honest; I don’t know what you are talking about either M, I suspect it was my piece on Amish women that set you off. Some people online think being mean is the point. Such unfocused name-calling feels like Middle School, you know, sticks and stones… But it is never persuasive…just…mean. I guess you’re trying to do biting criticism, but effective criticism goes far beyond insult I’m afraid. My wish for you is that you grow out of it.

      Oh, and Maria doesn’t think I’m brilliant either, and she loves me. She IS brilliant, as you suggest. ! You overwrite a bit, I think, in your slashing about, you’re hitting too many things, it’s jumbled, a shotgun spray of venom, you overreach a bit, it’s even ageist and anti-dog. You forget my bald spot and elder’s belly. But I do love the “thin-skinned dogmatic.”

      That’s a nice one, and sadly, there’s much truth to it, and I am a dangler for sure, in more ways than you can know.

      Here’s to dogs and babies; may they rule forever. Best luck to you.

      1. Laughing out loud! I, too, echoed Maria’s befuddlement and was about to pour apple cider vinegar on my device to get rid of the “mange”, but now I find myself inadvertently grateful because your response to it was fantastic!
        And, as one of the uninformed, flip phone-using puppy lovers who finds you appealing, I concur that not only dogs and babies should rule forever, but let’s add sun worshiping barn cats, photogenic fowl, shutter-friendly sheep, and meditative donkeys – otherwise the world is lost.

        1. Thanks, Amy, I appreciate and love the name “mange..” It seems both elitist and obnoxious to me to patronize and stereotype dog and puppy people. I know an awful lot of smart ones, including writers, actors, professors, and CEOs, male and female.

          I love your list, I’ll get right on it..

          I know she means as some kind of put-down, but when I think of people who don’t like puppies, I think of Donald Trump and I feel good…are people without puppies supposed to be smart, is that the New York con she refers to? thanks for the note..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email SignupFree Email Signup